Insurgent Finance

Updated Version:




In the 70’s and 80’s Michael Milken was part of something rather remarkable. The son of an accountant, Milken was hardly born into old money, yet he raised billions of dollars to finance takeovers of major companies, in the process pulling in anual salaries that David Rockerfeller himslef called excesive. Some of the companies where declining industrial concerns, which Milken’s clients downsized, asset stripped and generaly liquidated, these where the “Corporate Raiders,” the villians in what was popularily understood as a morality play about unrestrained greed. Other clients built new telecommuncations companies, like MCI, that would become industry giants. Milken did this byway of issuing high-yield, “speculative grade” bonds, commonly derided as “Junk Bonds,” with Milken himself labeled the “Junk Bond King.” Milken never saw himself as a raider, and certainly not a king. The bonds the establishment called junk, represented to Milken a democratisation of Capital. Milken believed that he was a liberator that broke open the Capitalist vaults, getting Capital in the hands of a new generation of businesses that would otherwise have been shut out by the conservative old elite. In some sense that is true, Milken helded fuel the rise of many insurgents into a previously well heeled old guard, notably himself and the likes of Rupert Murdoch, Milken’s methods opened the door for a generation of gate crasher’s, elbowing into the ruling class. However, in the end this only created new elites, and did not democratize capital, let alone Capitalism. Today, capital continues to be concentrated in fewer and fewer hands, even if there may be a little more diversity among them. Yet, as I write this on my mobile phone flying to England for the Platform Politics conference to talk about my Telekommunist Manifesto, I can’t help but wonder could there be a Communist Micheal Milken? Could the financial techniques used to fund the hostile acquisitions of the Corporate Raiders be used to fund an insurgent Venture Communism? Several years into the Telekommunisten project I’m increasingly haunted by Marx’s warning that we can not overthrow society behind its back due to the narrow oportunities availble in our class condition. Bootstrapping Venture Communism has not yet happened, in large part because the proletarian members of the Telekommunisten network have no Capital, and therefor need to keep full time jobs to sustain ourselves and our families. Our part-time capacity to build new ventures is vastly insufficient to actually compete against capital funded firms. Bootstrapping Venture Communism by iniating self-funding ventures seems like more and more of a longshot for us. Perhaps it’s simple desperation driven by revolutionry zeal, but the idea of employing insurgent finance to capture and mutualize existing operating companies is very attractive, and in many ways the conditions seem simular. Interests rates are at historic lows, and may investors are looking for secuuties with better yields, even if they come with some risk as the markets themselves are unstable. Also, the declining Industrial concerns giving way to Globalizing Industry are perhaps mirrored by declining independent Internet Service Providers and the distributed, P2P infrastructure they traded in giving way to massive conglomerates and centralized platforms. The few remaining ISPs seem like ideal targets for Venture Communist take-over. And such take overs would be supported even by those who deny class struggle, yet oppose the centralization of the internet on sharing and privacy grounds. Will the next proletarian revolutions take place, not in battles, nor in elections, but on the trading floors?

Leave a Reply